Bundle.social Pricing in 2026: Plans, Limits and What's Missing
Bundle.social prices by usage — posts and comments per month — rather than by connected social account. Every paid plan ships with unlimited social accounts, which is unusual in this category and worth understanding before you assume it works like Ayrshare or Buffer. Verified against Bundle.social's own pricing page in September 2026.
#Bundle.social's Current Pricing Tiers
| Plan | Price/month | Posts/month | Comments/month | Social accounts | API access |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | 20 | 50 | 3 | Yes |
| Pro | $100 | 10,000 | 5,000 | Unlimited | Yes |
| Business | $400 | 100,000 | 50,000 | Unlimited | Yes |
| Custom | Custom | Custom | Custom | Unlimited | Yes |
Every tier, including free, includes API access, a media library, analytics, a calendar, bulk posting, and a link-in-bio feature. The difference between tiers is pure volume — how many posts and comments you can push per month — not which features unlock.
There's one surcharge that doesn't show up in the plan comparison: X (Twitter) posts cost extra, $0.015 per post and $0.20 per post that includes a link, on top of your monthly plan. If your posting mix leans heavily on X, factor that in — it's the one place the flat-rate story breaks down.
#What This Pricing Model Gets Right
Unlimited accounts on every paid plan means Bundle.social doesn't punish you for connecting more customers the way per-profile (Ayrshare) or per-channel (Buffer, Postiz) pricing does. If you're running a SaaS product where each new signup connects several accounts, your bill doesn't move until your post volume crosses a threshold — a materially different cost curve than Ayrshare's per-profile model, where every new customer profile adds directly to the invoice.
The trade-off: at low account counts with high posting frequency, usage-based pricing can cost more than per-account pricing would. A single power user account posting 50 times a day burns through the free tier's 20 posts/month limit in under a day.
#What's Missing
A few things worth checking before committing:
- No published MCP server. As of September 2026, Bundle.social's public documentation doesn't list an MCP server, official or otherwise. If AI-agent publishing is part of your roadmap, this is a gap compared to Buffer, Hootsuite, or Schedule & Chill, all of which have one that executes real publish calls.
- No visible per-profile or per-seat team structure. Unlimited accounts is generous, but the pricing page doesn't detail team member seats or role-based permissions the way enterprise-focused competitors do.
- The X per-post fee is easy to miss. It's mentioned in the fine print, not the plan comparison table, and it's the one cost that scales with a specific platform rather than your overall plan.
- Free tier's 3-account cap is tight if you're testing a multi-tenant use case — you'll hit it evaluating with more than a couple of test customers.
#Bundle.social vs. Schedule & Chill
| Bundle.social | Schedule & Chill | |
|---|---|---|
| Entry price | Free (20 posts/mo, 3 accounts) | Free (500 posts/mo, 2 accounts) |
| Pricing basis | Posts/comments per month | Connected accounts |
| Paid tier | $100/mo (10,000 posts, unlimited accounts) | None currently — free while more platforms clear review |
| API access | Yes, every tier | Yes |
| MCP server | Not published | Official, 21 tools, publishes |
| Per-platform surcharge | X posts cost extra | None |
Schedule & Chill's free plan has fewer posts/month (500 vs. Bundle.social's 20 on free, so Bundle.social's free tier is actually more restrictive on volume but less restrictive on account count relative to its own paid tiers). The honest comparison point is direction of growth: Bundle.social's cost grows with posting volume, Schedule & Chill's free plan is currently capped by account count with no paid escape valve yet. See the full side-by-side for the complete breakdown.
Schedule & Chill is free while we open up more platforms — REST API, an MCP server that actually publishes, and a queryable media library, no credit card. See the pricing page.
#Who Bundle.social's Pricing Fits
Agencies managing many client accounts at moderate volume benefit most from the unlimited-accounts structure — the bill doesn't grow every time you onboard a new client, only when total posting volume crosses a tier line.
High-frequency single-account posters should model actual post count against the tier limits before committing; the free tier's 20 posts/month is easy to blow through with even light daily posting.
Teams already committed to X-heavy strategies should price in the per-post surcharge separately — it's the one line item that doesn't scale like the rest of the plan.
If you're comparing this against per-account pricing models more broadly, the developer-focused Ayrshare alternatives comparison and cheapest-alternative pricing breakdown both cover Bundle.social alongside five other providers at real usage tiers.
#Frequently Asked Questions
Does Bundle.social have a free plan? Yes. The free plan includes 20 posts/month, 50 comments/month, 3 social accounts, and API access — no card required for the free tier itself, though a 14-day trial of paid features is also offered.
How much does Bundle.social's API cost? API access is included on every plan, including free. There's no separate API pricing tier — the cost you pay is your plan's monthly price, gated by posting volume rather than API call count.
Does Bundle.social charge extra for X (Twitter) posts? Yes. Bundle.social charges $0.015 per X post and $0.20 per X post that includes a link, on top of the monthly plan price, regardless of tier.
Is there a cheaper alternative to Bundle.social? Depends on your usage pattern. At low account counts with high post volume, per-account pricing (Buffer, Postiz) can be cheaper than Bundle.social's usage-based model. Schedule & Chill is free for up to 2 connected accounts and 500 posts/month if that fits your current scale. Full pricing math is in The Cheapest Ayrshare Alternative in 2026.